Suchergebnisse
Filter
26 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Il costo del consenso: le decisioni pubbliche tra politica e mercato
In: Biblioteca di testi e studi 344
How the health services of Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy and Veneto handled the Covid-19 emergency
In: Contemporary Italian politics, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 226-241
ISSN: 2324-8831
Reducing waiting times in the Italian NHS: The case of Emilia‐Romagna
In: Social policy and administration, Band 54, Heft 7, S. 1110-1122
ISSN: 1467-9515
AbstractIn 2015, the Emilia‐Romagna Regional Government implemented a plan to reduce waiting times for elective outpatient procedures. The objective set by the regional government establishes that at least 90 per cent of specialist services are to be provided within the following maximum waiting times: 30 days for the first specialist consultation, and 60 days for diagnostic tests. The plan adopted by the Emilia‐Romagna Regional Government is of particular interest because it encompasses a combined strategy. Some of the interventions envisaged in the plan aim at increasing the supply of specialist services. Others address the demand side, seeking to reduce inadequate requests and discourage no‐shows by patients. And others focus on combining supply and demand and neutralizing the effects of some perverse incentives. The Emilia‐Romagna plan appears to have had a successful outcome. In the first 4 years of implementation, the 90 per cent target has not only been achieved but also widely exceeded.
Prevalence and Generosity of Health Insurance Coverage: A Comparison of EU Member States
In: Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, Band 21, Heft 5, S. 518-534
ISSN: 1572-5448
The Italian NHS, the Public/Private Sector Mix and the Disparities in Access to Healthcare
In: Global social welfare: research, policy, & practice, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 171-178
ISSN: 2196-8799
The choice of healthcare models: How much does politics matter
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 159-172
ISSN: 1460-373X
This article discusses the main hypotheses generated within the strand of research that focuses on health politics. These hypotheses are subjected to a brief empirical test, presenting data from 15 OECD countries. There seems to be a correspondence between the healthcare models adopted in different national contexts and the ideological orientation of the governments that have instituted them. Most laws instituting a system of social health insurance have been advanced by conservative governments, while those instituting a national health service have been passed -- in the majority of cases -- by social-democratic governments. The resulting clashes between governments and competing interest groups are largely attributable to the institutional setting. Thus, in the period from 1945 to 2000, most of those countries where political power was more concentrated implemented a national health service. Conversely, those countries where political power was more dispersed tended to maintain a system of voluntary or social health insurance. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright, the International Political Science Association.]
The choice of healthcare models: How much does politics matter?
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 159-172
ISSN: 0192-5121
The choice of healthcare models: How much does politics matter?
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 159-172
ISSN: 1460-373X
This article discusses the main hypotheses generated within the strand of research that focuses on health politics. These hypotheses are subjected to a brief empirical test, presenting data from 15 OECD countries. There seems to be a correspondence between the healthcare models adopted in different national contexts and the ideological orientation of the governments that have instituted them. Most laws instituting a system of social health insurance have been advanced by conservative governments, while those instituting a national health service have been passed – in the majority of cases – by social-democratic governments. The resulting clashes between governments and competing interest groups are largely attributable to the institutional setting. Thus, in the period from 1945 to 2000, most of those countries where political power was more concentrated implemented a national health service. Conversely, those countries where political power was more dispersed tended to maintain a system of voluntary or social health insurance.
Yes, we did »? Luci ed ombre della riforma sanitaria di Obama - 1. Introduzione. - 2. L'eccezionalismo americano e le spiegazioni politologiche. - 3. Una serie di riforme fallite. - 4. Cosa prevede la riforma sanitaria 2010. - 5. L'iter parlamentare della riforma sanitaria. - 6. Gruppi di interesse ...
In: Italian Political Science Review: Rivista italiana di scienza politica, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 105-131
ISSN: 0048-8402
Is there a Southern European Healthcare Model?
In: West European politics, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 325-343
ISSN: 1743-9655
Is there a Southern European healthcare model?
In: West European politics, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 325-343
ISSN: 0140-2382
World Affairs Online
How European Integration Changes National Parties: Evidence from a 15-Country Study
In: West European politics, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 297-325
ISSN: 0140-2382
Le riforme sanitarie in Europa: tra continuita e cambiamento
In: Rivista italiana di politiche pubbliche, Heft 2, S. 69-92
ISSN: 1722-1137